Podcast transcription:
The “ISKCON” Cult Enforcer:
A Most Dangerous Sahajiyä
by Kailäsa Candra däsa
OÀ NAMO BHAGAVATE VÄSUDEVAYA
This month’s presentation marks the conclusion of our analysis exposing the corruption within what is today only posing itself as the Hare Kåñëa movement. We presented many root issues connected to this, and they were analyzed threadbare. This month also marks the second installment detailing “ISKCON” sahajiyäism, its many threads within a quasi-Eastern, post-modern organized religion. In particular, this month we shall discuss the power rogues of the “ISKCON” institution and their potential menace.
“ISKCON” is a hazy operation. It is a religion shot through with in-house fissures and competition, producing never-ending strife. It has any number of villains feeding off of its deviations, all of whom appear to be well-dressed sädhus and dragon ladies. It is shot through with Hindoo influences and covert Mäyäväda tendencies, also.
It is loaded with pseudo-devotional personalities, propped up by faulty shibboleths, along with a self-serving misinterpretation of its past that is anything but historically accurate. It pushes mistaken knowledge in the guise of realization, and it thrives on the haze thus produced.
The haze serves the maze. If you want to escape this labyrinth of cheap, so-called bhakti-yoga, you require clear explanations about what that religion actually is. This entails clear knowledge and indisputable facts. “ISKCON” is a post-modern, Western manifestation of splintered sahajiyäism, and this can be seen–as long as you want to see it. You can be free from its influence . . .
but only if you want to escape its labyrinth.
Your host speaker was a sports writer for a radical rag in the late Sixties and early Seventies. It was a campus newspaper that produced six editions each week, and I read it regularly. Every week, it would reprint one or two nationally syndicated cartoons, and, as would be expected, it was very much anti-war in general. With the Vietnam conflict raging, I specifically remember one of these cartoons from October of my Freshman year in 1969.
It was a semi-realistic, black-and-white drawing depicting a brawny, helmeted soldier in the middle of a blackened landscape, one where smoke was billowing in the background, along with darkened, skeletal trees and a couple of dead bodies. The warrior, his face coated with soot, holding his M-15, was standing in the middle of the devastation wearing thick jackboots, covered with grenades and knives hanging from his duty belt. The caption read:
“I think I won.”
Employing this as an analogy, each “ISKCON” sahajiyä, particularly each of its enforcers, has a similar mentality. Each of them has been—and continues to be–willing and able to destroy the movement in order to prevail over everyone else initiated by Prabhupäda, especially those still standing in his way. These sahajiyäs are ultimately absurdists, but they are also narcissists who play for keeps. They overlord everyone within their wheelhouse via subtle yet effective Machiavellian methods. As one governing body commissioner said to your host speaker on January 9th, 1978:
“This movement is run Machiavellian.”
In the process, the “ISKCON” sahajiyäs have killed the enthusiasm of countless devotees over the course of the last four-plus decades, while positioning themselves in the center of a hijacked movement. They have spiritually devastated it, converting it into something new: They have converted it into a post-modern, Western sahajiyä apa-sampradäya.
Last month, we discussed two categories of Neo-jäta Gosäïi as they pertain to “ISKCON.” These categories remain relevant, but herein we shall explore a further subdivision. The Party Men are mostly laid back, of course. By definition, they have either no personal charisma or very little of it. They are loyal to the institution, and thus they thrive on institutional charisma. In “ISKCON,” the majority of these Party Men are brähmins and sannyäsés of Southeast Asian birth, mostly former Hindoos.
The other category, as discussed last month, is the charismatics. These clowns are show-boaters loaded with personal charisma, although, ultimately, they are also Party Men, pledging fealty to the Governing Body Commission. Yet, because of their personal charisma, they are arrogant and narcissistic, sometimes vain to the max. They stretch the rubber band at times, and usually they get away with it, because the Commish does not hammer down. After all, they bring numbers, and that is very important to “ISKCON.”
The laid back Party Men are rather obnoxious and unattractive. As such, they do not bring anywhere near the numbers that the charismatics bring. Yet, they outnumber the charismatics, because all organized religions, whether Western or Eastern, require such men to make up the core of their higher echelons, providing a kind of quasi-stability . . . and certainly the fabricated, so-called “ISKCON” is just such an organized religion.
However, there is a particular kind of sahajiyä in “ISKCON”—yes, he is still Neo-jäta Gosäïi—who partakes of both categories, although this is individualized. What has just been stated here may appear difficult to understand, but it will be explained as our presentation moves forward. This kind of sahajiyä does not comprise a separate category, as he functions in one of the two categories we have just discussed.
He is the “ISKCON” Enforcer.
This sahajiyä is a most dangerous man. Ultimately, he is as absurd as any of the others, but he is much more dangerous. Step-by-step, he is also moving down and bringing the movement with him, but, superficially, it appears otherwise. Do not think that all of the sahajiyäs are not dangerous. They are, but some are more dangerous than others. Consider this January 24th room conversation in Bhubanesvara, India, in Prabhupäda’s final year physically manifest, 1977:
Leading Secretary: (He) had found all these new secrets.
Prabhupäda: That will happen. Sahajiyä.
Leading Secretary: Posing himself as a big, learned man.
Prabhupäda: My guru mahäräja used to say, “When our men will be sahajiyä, he will be more dangerous.”
Leading Secretary: Our own men.
Prabhupäda: Bhaktisiddhänta Sarasvaté Öhäkura, he said that “When our men will be sahajiyä, oh, they’ll be more dangerous.” So our men are becoming, some of them, sahajiyäs. This very word he said, that “When our men will be sahajiyäs, he’ll be more dangerous.”
Notice the leading secretary affirming that what is being discussed is “our own men.” Consider the obvious ramifications. The sahajiyäs who are the most dangerous in “ISKCON” let you know why they are so, especially if you have the misfortune of coming within their orbit. Sometimes, they are in the Party Man category. Sometimes, they are in the charismatic category, although they always put institutional dogma above personality.
If it was just the Party Men (laid back, eating nicely, acting as rent-äcäryas), then the cult would flounder. If it was just the charismatic and arrogant show-bottles, then the cult would also flounder, but in a different way. It is this particular kind of sahajiyä, the “ISKCON” Enforcer, straddling both categories, who keeps “ISKCON” from cratering.
He is The Cult Enforcer. . . and he is highly Machiavellian.
Now, you may opine that The Cult Enforcer would have to be from the Party Man category, from that side of the ledger. Often he is, of course, but that is not set in stone. Most of the pretender mahäbhägavats of the late Seventies and early Eighties were charismatics, yet many of them were also enforcers. Kirtanänanda is the prime example here.
One the other side of the ledger, you have T.K.G., who was a dyed-in-the-wool Party Man, with very little (if any) personal charisma. Yet, he was certainly an enforcer, and that is one of the reasons that I have tagged him as the The Machiavellian Manipulator.
All eleven of those rascals were big-time sahajiyäs. The eleven were also Party Men, because, despite all of them being commissioners when the colossal hoax went down, they were, without exception, dependent upon G.B.C. imprimatur in order to begin and continue their shenanigans.
The Machiavellian maze that infests “ISKCON” is kept intact by its enforcers, who utilize fear and guilt emotionally to great advantage. Intellectually, they utilize doubt. Utility is the principle for them . . . in that way. They are covert sadists, and they take great delight in snapping the chelas and deluding them. They are cult manipulators, and whatever they are pushing at any moment can turn on a dime to something exactly opposite.
Today’s Cult Enforcers would rather be feared than loved, although they often infuse within their chelas a perverse love of fear. Another way of saying the same thing is that these powerful cult manipulators turn their chelas, in many cases, into peculiar types of masochists. At that time, those kick-mees slide down a notch, desiring to be kept in line by the enforcers, and, in that way, they learn to love their superiors in the horror rasa.
Now, real love of Godhead is a stronger energy than fear in all cases, but how many devotees—either inside or outside the walls of “ISKCON”–possess that pure love? Virtually everyone in conditional life is subject to fear. Sometimes, you see macho vikarmés wearing tee-shirts with the words NO FEAR emblazoned on them. In almost all cases, it is a complete bluff, as everyone subjected to the three werewolves coming for them on the astral plane at death is utterly terrified at that time.
By what means did a sahajiyä “ISKCON” Enforcer attain his status? What is it based upon? These questions may be justly raised. Did Prabhupäda occasionally dovetail fear in order to correct his disciples? Most certainly. Did Prabhupäda also dovetail anger in the service of the Supreme Lord? Absolutely.
All you have to do is listen to five lectures at random, and the odds are high that, in at least one of them, Prabhupäda is manifesting transcendental anger. His Divine Grace even once cursed an enemy, who died shortly thereafter; this quickly became well known throughout the movement and led to an important purchase of property in India.
As such, what is the fear that the Cult Enforcers project? Why, the answer is quite simple: It is imitation of the Äcärya, as referenced in the purport to Caitanya-caritämåta, Madhya-Lélä, Chapter Ten, text 23:
“ . . . they commit offenses by considering a bona fide spiritual master an ordinary human being . . . such sahajiyäs are most unfortunate. Because of their misconceptions, they fall into a hellish condition.”
However, before they fall into any such a condition, they make sure that others under them fall first. Misery loves company, and the Cult Enforcers do not want their slaves to experience any kind of better condition. Incompetence breeds corruption, and the enforcer-sahajiyäs of “ISKCON” were mostly incompetent in how they managed the Society even before the Founder’s departure. This incompetence continued during the nine year odyssey of the zonal imposition, and it continues today.
During this whole period , corruption has only grown.
These mis-leaders were and remain all sahajiyäs (as we detailed meticulously last month), but the Machiavellian Enforcers of “ISKCON” were and are of a particular variety, as has already been explained. Some of them are entirely Party Men, without any personal charisma. Others, as has already been mentioned, are charismatics who do not rely upon institutional charisma, being able to personally produce it for themselves.
As such, the question may be raised as to what is actually the chief factor of differentiation between the Cult Enforcers and the Party Men? What is the chief factor of differentiation with the blatant “ISKCON” sahajiyäs, who also are not like the enforcers in terms of their personalities and characters. The answer is directly connected to values and interests.
The laid back Party Men are not at all interested in “ISKCON” taking over the world, and they make no effort to create that outcome. In point of fact, it would potentially be against their interests for that to go down, as they then may no longer be allowed perpetual residence on Easy Street.
Similarly, the charismatic enjoyers also have no such interest or objective. They are not enforcers by personality or character, and it is not at all a part of their shtick. They also do not make any effort for “ISKCON” to attain any kind of political power in the world at large or form any interfaith alliances as a prerequisite for a potential takeover. Their egregious enjoyments would be threatened if the whole world was watching.
The Cult Enforcers, however, have a very strong interest in attaining political influence; without exception, this is a value they all posses, and it is their fundamental goal. That desire is integral to their personality. That desire for power is integral to their sva-bhäva, brought over into this life.
Many of the Cult Enforcers were Inquisitors back in the horrific epoch of Gothic “Christianity.” They would like nothing better than to have a post-modern reset in the name of a new organized religion. They want to find ways and means to make it happen. For example, if they could finagle a marriage with The Technocracy sooner rather than later, that would certainly lead to all kinds of political influence in due course of time.
The Technocracy is currently in a battle for mundane, political supremacy with The Gerontocracy. Both are fantastically rich and influential, especially in the Western World. There can be little doubt that, within the next half decade, The Technocracy will emerge victorious in this war for supremacy and thus become the next set of the powers that be. And, when that transpires, censorship on a scale never before seen is apt to be put into place.
Today’s Cult Enforcers are not nearly as powerful as they were at the end of the Seventies and in the early Eighties, even during the mid-Eighties. Such overlording simply is no longer as acceptable to the congregation as it once was. Intimidation is no longer nearly as effective, although this should not be misinterpreted to mean that such psychic terror has become non-existent in all cases. It hasn’t, but the “ISKCON” mafia is not what it used to be.
As such, the Hinduization of “ISKCON,” The Third Transformation, has continued dumbing down the power of overlording. This trend will continue during The Fourth Transformation, which is imminent. However, what you all must know and realize is that “ISKCON” can turn on a dime at any moment under fresh circumstances. The flags waived in past decades (and then, soon thereafter, trashed) can be once again unfurled. It all comes down to whether or not that slave state can be rejuvenated and perpetuated, although it is currently waning to a noticeable extent.
Do not for a moment believe that The Cult Enforcers are unaware of this. They are very aware of it. They never speak about it, because that could only produce repercussions against their interest. They had a big-time setback after the zonal äcärya hoax crashed and burned, but such a failure only denotes loss of a major battle; they have not lost the war.
Should they be able to once again revive the slave state that they had in place in the late Seventies—even while Prabhupäda was still with us—they would rejoice within themselves . . . and make it work this time!
Consider this excerpt from Matthew Brady’s Illustrated History of the Civil War, which contained not only seven hundred graphic photos, but also some astute text. Here’s what he said about the slave faction:
“The bill provided for giving permission to the inhabitants of those Territories (the newly formed Territories of Nebraska and Kansas) to decide for themselves whether slavery should or should not exist within their domain. This proposed nullification of the Missouri Compromise produced rancorous controversies . . . After long and bitter discussion in both Houses of Congress, the bill became law . . . In the light of historic events, it is clear today that men, who afterward appeared as leaders in the war against our government, were then concocting and executing schemes for the extension of the domain of the slave system. IT MUST EXPAND OR SUFFOCATE.” (emphasis added)
TATTVAMASI
IT MUST EXPAND OR SUFFOCATE.
There is currently some expansion of “ISKCON” throughout the world, but it is all of the horizontal variety. The Party Man sahajiyäs are certainly expanding. The lovey-dovey, flagrant, narcissistic sahajiyäs are also expanding, but not so much, since many of them do not actually want to expand. The pond is shrinking anyway, so the big fish don’t want more to proliferate.
However, it is the Cult Enforcer Party which is definitely not expanding, mostly due to attrition provided by the Grim Reaper. None of their disciples are qualified to fill the position due to lack of training and lack of initiative. The seed is just not there in those chelas and kick-mees. “ISKCON” in its present form is only partially prepared to take advantage of any opening for world power that may arise when all hell breaks loose, which it will.
Spiritual science must be received through a genuine branch of disciplic succession. If any movement pretends to be such a branch, but is actually changing the source code–and, by so doing, covering the science and the process–then genuine spiritual and devotional advancement cannot be had there. To mislead people in general (along with their own chelas and everyone else under their direct influence), the Cult Enforcers, sahajiyäs all, become so-called äcäryas on the strength of G.B.C. imprimatur and imitation.
However, whether well-known or not at the present time, they do not even follow the basic principles of the paramparäÄcäryas. These rogues are the most dangerous elements in human society. They are a potential menace worldwide, but few (if any) world leaders realize this. It is doubtful that any governments run by the powers-that-be currently realize it.
And because there is no religious government anywhere, the Cult Enforcers escape punishment by law of the State. They may not, however, escape dire consequences for their excesses much longer, as people are catching on to their spiritual master business–controlled mostly by the Cult Enforcers–all of whom enjoy sense gratification in a heavy-handed way.
Remember, the Cult Enforcers have made many false statements over the years. For example, the eleven great pretenders claimed that Prabhupäda appointed them as initiating spiritual masters. He didn’t. They claimed that they were mahäbhägavats. They weren’t. They claimed that those who did not accept them as pure devotees were, in the words of The Machiavellian Manipulator, “on the precipice of spiritual disaster.” In point of fact, those devotees who recognized that those eleven sahajiyäs were not pure devotees were proven right in due course of time.
Sahajiyäs are, by constitution, prone to making false statements . . . and then enforcing them within the confines of their organization. Since they are lying to everyone concerning their status in spiritual realization and devotional purity, they are naturally prone to all kinds of mendacity.
What is underlying this? In a purport to Caitanya-caritämåta, Ädi-Lélä, Chapter 17, text 230, Prabhupäda gives us a hint:
“The rascal sahajiyäs may manufacture such false statements, but no one should believe them because they are motivated by enmity against the Vaiñëavas.”
Having set the stage for the latter imitators, what could possibly be the initial motivation of the eleven great pretenders? Was it love of Prabhupäda? Was their imitation of His Divine Grace to be interpreted as love for him?
How can anyone believe that?
It was their vanity, their narcissism. It was their desire to enjoy the power that the çaktyäveçavatär deservedly had available to him, automatically. And, as indicated by the previous quote from the Ädi-Lélä purport, it was also enmity ofPrabhupäda. All of this is now being exposed.
Immature devotees sometimes view Çréla Prabhupäda as a person who was proud. They believe that he made statements about his status out of personal vanity. However, Prabhupäda always spoke about himself in complete accordance to guru, çästra, and sädhu. Whether he manifested love or transcendental anger in his lectures or room conversations, he was furthering the Kåñëa consciousness movement in his preaching.
Sure, there were a handful of instances where he affirmed that he was jagad-guru. Why not? It was already established when he was worshiped in that way on his vyäsäsana. His speech and behavior was always in accord with what is expected from the highest transcendentalist. It was not a manifestation of mundane pride when he was forcefully confronted nonsense philosophies, neither did he do so outside of a service attitude toward his gurumahäräj and Kåñëa. There was not a scintilla of vanity in any of his preaching.
That cannot be said of the eleven great pretenders, obviously.
The cultivation of their own perverted form of consciousness by the initial wave of sahajiyäs (and those who have followed in their footsteps) entailed delusion, narcissism, and self-righteousness. This continues and, if everything breaks right for them, an environment will be created in which their menace will burst forth. If that goes down, it would be validation in their eyes.
And they would then continue to engage in overlording—including mortal combat against all those who work against their interest—in order to validate their warped sense of righteousness and so-called Vaiñëavism.
It is all based on the vanity that crept into their astral bodies while Prabhupäda was still physically manifest, a vanity which kept growing and growing and growing. Sahajiyäism is not always of that variety. As we have pointed out, many “ISKCON” sahajiyäs simply want to be adored by their followers and sycophants, but do not want to take it further.
Such is not the case, however, with the Cult Enforcers, who want power. They are Grand Inquisitors in the making. Torquemada was the most prominent of the inquisitors during the horrific Gothic epoch of “Christianity.” He was greatly feared, as he burned hundreds of innocent people at the stake for the most superfluous of reasons. He was, naturally, also greatly hated. He had upwards of two hundred bodyguards with him at all times.
In the Gothic epoch, you had to accept the Roman Catholic version of the meaning of life. You had to do so not only in order to remain a member of that religion, but also, under certain circumstances, to even remain alive. Indeed while “Christianity” was fading, rationalism and empiricism made inroads in Western Europe. Torquemada’s later lineage was fighting this new trend not long after that Grand Inquisitor was sent to his just deserts, and there is now an irony concerning this battle between religion and science.
The history of science entails a history of revolution. It is a history not only of kingdom or nation-state revolutions, but also cosmological and social, as per the Copernican Revolution, the Darwinian Revolution, and the Communist Revolution, which is anything but dead.
In the distant past, (beginning, for all practical purposes, in the Seventeenth Century), the Age of Science fundamentally attempted to overthrow the authority of the Church. Combined with Continental Reason and British Empiricism, it culminated in the French Revolution, a ruthlessly violent affair. The guillotine replaced burning Bruno at the stake. The Age of Science was a new window valuing mundane experiment, faulty human logic, and idealist speculation. It has culminated in The Technocracy of today.
The potential menace of the Cult Enforcers, rooted in their immeasurable vanity and narcissism, is that they are able to form an alliance with The Technocracy in the indeterminate future. They will have this opportunity only when the atheistic Technocracy realizes—which it finally will—that there can be no One World Government without a One World Religion accompanying it. When things get really bad, people turn to God.
The Technocracy will realize that their grip on control of the people–via control of communication and media—will crater violently if not allied with some kind of religion. The marriage of “ISKCON” and The Technocracy would be very different: It would be radical Left and entirely post-modern, but it needs that rubber-stamp of mass theocratic approval.
“ISKCON” will be more than happy to provide it–under the right circumstances. The deviant cult is capable of practically any compromise in order to increase its current momentum, which is certainly slowing. The “ISKCON” Enforcer realizes this suffocation more clearly than others. The others care little or nothing about attaining power outside of the cult, and, even within it, they are quite content with their share. Neither are they very much keen to enforce cult orthodox, the institutional dogma.
The “ISKCON” Enforcer, however, makes it his business to shove the dogma of the moment down everyone’s throats. The dragon ladies also, especially the ones who can now receive the No Objection Certificate and become initiating gurus. Nevertheless, for the sake of convenience, we shall henceforward employ only the male pronoun.
He appears to be very heavy, and, at times, he most certainly is . . . but not heavy with knowledge. He is heavy when he comes down hard on any devotee in his organization—and this can sometimes even include other sahajiyäs—for questioning the dogma of the moment. As aforementioned, he is also different in that he wants his power—as do all of his fellow rogues who are enforcers—to expand exponentially into the mundane world.
The “ISKCON” Enforcer is a vain man, but generally he hides it quite well. Sometimes, but rarely, there is a slip. For example, as the new guru seats were being removed from temple rooms in the mid-Eighties, one of these prominent enforcers sat upon it in order to give a platform lecture. He had never done so before The Second Transformation was going down (which it was at that time). Everyone knew that this new guru high seat was going to be removed, perhaps as soon as that very day. Nevertheless, he gave a lecture from it.
In other words, the “ISKCON” Enforcer is also an absurdist just like his other comrades, but he—and his vanity–demarcates a particular dangerous variety of narcissism. Remember what Prabhupäda had to say about him:
Prabhupäda: That will happen. Sahajiyä.
Leading Secretary: Posing himself as a big, learned man.
Prabhupäda: My guru mahäräja used to say, “When our men will be sahajiyä, he will be more dangerous.”
Leading Secretary: Our own men.
Prabhupäda: Bhaktisiddhänta Sarasvaté Öhäkura, he said that “When our men will be sahajiyä, oh, they’ll be more dangerous.” So our men are becoming, some of them, sahajiyäs. This very word he said, that “When our men will be sahajiyäs, he’ll be more dangerous.”
More dangerous. Logically, this indicates that Prabhupada considered at least some of his leading secretaries to already be dangerous. Remember, the whole conversation is referring to “our men,” confirmed by the leading secretary conducting it. After Prabhupada departed, they indeed became more dangerous. The zonal äcärya imposition proved that beyond doubt.
The “ISKCON” Enforcer is certainly dangerous within his own cult, but that is not entirely what is being referenced in this room conversation. Prabhupäda’s statement here has no such limitation. There is potential for the prominent Cult Enforcers to, at some time in the indeterminate future, go international—and make Torquemada look like a piker.
This could go down if and/or when “ISKCON” marries The Technocracy in order to simultaneously create a one-world government and a one-world religion. Both parties will have to prove themselves to one another during the stage of courtship. The fabricated, so-called “ISKCON” confederation will had to have taken the pole position, by this time, amongst its fellow religious organizations—and recognized by The Technocracy as having done so.
That’s what the “ISKCON” Interfaith Initiative is all about.
After that preliminary but necessary attainment has been secured, The Technocracy will need proof of sincerity. It will request compromises, and the Cult Enforcers, the only representatives of the cult in dealing with The Technocracy, will oblige.
Always remember that “ISKCON” is willing to make any and all compromises at any time. It has changed the source code, as has been evidenced repeatedly, including Hinduization and the authorization of F.D.G. There is no such thing as a madhyam female dékñä-guru in any genuine Vaiñëava line . . . but in “ISKCON,” there is such a thing, because the G.B.C. recently changed the source code once again and concocted that deviation.
However, “ISKCON” will also require a similar gesture from The Technocracy. It is certain that this request will entail suppression of the whistleblowers. Today, if you are serious about discovering the truth about “ISKCON,” the INTERNET provides this for you. You have to make some effort to cut through all of the white noise, but you can overcome all historical revisionism via post-modern communication facilitation. That you are watching this video or reading its transcript is proof of this fact.
The Cult Enforcers want to oppress and suppress whistleblowers. Legacy media (previous to the INTERNET) posed little threat to “ISKCON,” and the message of the whistleblowers, few in number those days, was not covered. With the advent of the INTERNET, this has changed. The Technocracy controls virtually all of the INTERNET, and it could even probably put a dent into the dark web if it was intent upon doing so.
If servers, website, and video channels utilized by Vaisnava whistleblowers were shut down completely to them—including even the facilitation of e-mail exchanges between and amongst themselves–then the post-modern inquisitors of “ISKCON” could and would accomplish their goals, unimpeded.
The First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion, especially freedom of dissent as a genuine form of religious expression. When it comes to exposing irreligion disguised as religion (which “ISKCON” is), any censoring of that Constitutional freedom–including censorship by omission or falsely labeling devotee whistleblowers as engaging in hate speech–would play right into the schemes of the Cult Enforcers. Only The Technocracy, however, could accomplish this on behalf of the sahajiyä cult.
Begin instrumental
The “ISKCON” Interfaith Initiative is the leading edge of an effort to come out top dog during the establishment of a One World Religion underpinning a World Government. Such an outcome is not a metaphysical lock; it is a dreadful potential only. It can be stopped.
The Cult Enforcers need that One World Religion–as long as they are leading it–but they have an achilles heel. That collective achilles heel is their V-A-N-I-T-Y, which is immeasurable, despite the fact that they are past masters at hiding it. They are overconfident. They think they’ve won, having destroyed everything in order to have achieved their pyrrhic victory.
They are all vainglorious. This must be exposed and their momentum checked. Although they are all ultimately jokers, contempt alone will not help us in thwarting them. If their influence is not terminated soon, they can and will become extremely dangerous.
SAD EVA SAUMYA